Posted 08/28/2021 in Category 1

Catastrophe Theory in Sport

Catastrophe Theory in Sport

Similar to other theories of anxiety and sport performance, such as Multidimensional Anxiety Theory (MAT), the Catastrophe Theory (Hardy, 1990; Hardy & Fazey, 1987) also considers how cognitive and physiological elements of anxiety relate to performance. However Catastrophe Theory is an advancement on MAT because it considers how these two elements interact to influence performance. Specifically, it considers how cognitive anxiety and physiological arousal (not somatic anxiety which is a perception of physiological state) interact to influence performance.  To illustrate why the interaction is important the relationship between cognitive anxiety and performance is different depending on the level of physiological arousal and the relationship between physiological arousal and performance is different depending on the level of cognitive anxiety.  Simply, according to Catastrophe Theory you cannot know how cognitive anxiety relates to performance unless you know the level of physiological arousal and vice versa. This three dimensional relationship between cognitive anxiety physiological arousal and performance is shown in the image at the top of the page. 

The left hand side of the three dimensional relationship where physiological arousal is low shows increases in cognitive anxiety will help performance whereas the opposite occurs when physiological arousal is high (the right hand side). But perhaps to best explain catastrophe theory it is perhaps easiest, in the first instance to consider the back and the front face of the three-dimensional relationship and consider the relationship between physiological arousal and performance in which cognitive anxiety acts as a splitting function.  When an individual is experiencing low levels of cognitive anxiety the relationship between physiological arousal and performance is in the shape of a gentle inverted-U. When cognitive anxiety is high increases in physiological arousal will facilitate performance up to an optimum level but decreases past the optimum level will result in a severe performance decrement (i.e. a catastrophe).  To regain composure and optimum performance a large reduction in physiological arousal is necessary before the athlete can seek to regain the optimum level.  It is only when cognitive anxiety is high that increases in physiological arousal above the optimum will lead to the sharp catastrophic decreases in performance. 

That the relationship between physiological arousal and performance is different under conditions of high cognitive anxiety depending on whether or not physiological arousal is increasing or decreasing is termed hysteresis.  The hysteresis has been demonstrated in eight crown green bowlers (Hardy, Parfitt & Pates, 1994) who completed a bowling task under conditions of low cognitive anxiety, where their individual data would not be compared to anyone’s, and high cognitive anxiety where they were told their scores would be compared to elite crown green bowlers. Physiological arousal was manipulated using physical exercise and half the participants did the task with physiological arousal increasing and half with physiological arousal decreasing.  While there was evidence of a substantial reduction in performance under conditions of high cognitive anxiety as physiological arousal was increasing there was no evidence of a substantial decrease in physiological arousal necessary to before the bowlers ‘flipped’ back to the upper performance surface of the model. There is other support for the central tenets of Catastrophe Theory (e.g., Edwards & Hardy, 1996; Hardy, Woodman & Carrington, 2004). Although Catastrophe Theory has been criticised as being too complex to test and therefore of dubious value to sport psychologists (Gill, 1994).  That said, elements of the theory have been tested and as Hardy et al (1996) point out complexity is not a reason for rejecting a theory.   

Both MAT and Catastrophe Theory describe and explain the relationship between anxiety and performance. Perhaps both are stronger on the description rather than the explanation and in it is important to consider how anxiety can influence motor performance in a bit more detail.  Approaches like the Conscious Processing Hypothesis developed by Richard Masters are perhaps stronger on explaining the mechanisms by which anxiety may affect sport performance. 

About Sporting Bounce

We are an online directory of sport psychology consultants from around the globe. Search our easy to use directory to find a sport psychologist near you.   

If you would like to work on your mental game then please also see our range of sport psychology courses or why not see our range of live and recorded sport psychology webinars

If you are a sport psychology consultant yourself then please see our great range of membership packages and join our sport psychology directory!


Image of Catastrophe Theory Taken from Taken from - McNally, I. M. (2002). Contrasting Concepts of Competitive State-Anxiety in Sport:  Multidimensional Anxiety and Catastrophe Theories. Athletic Insight: The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 4.


Edwards, T., & Hardy, L. (1996). The interactive effects of intensity and direction of cognitive and somatic anxiety and self-confidence upon performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 296-312.

Hardy, L. (1990). A catastrophe model of performance in sport.  In G. Jones and L. Hardy (Eds.), Stress and performance in sport. (pp. 81-106).  Chichester, England:  Wiley.

Hardy, L., & Fazey, J. (1987). The inverted-U hypothesis: A catastrophe for sport psychology? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Vancouver, June. 

Hardy, L., Jones, G., & Gould, D. (1996). Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Hardy, L., Parfitt, G., & Pates, J. (1994). Performance catastrophes in sport: A test of the hysteresis hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12, 327-334.

Hardy, l., Woodman, T., & Carrington, S. (2004). Is self-confidence a bias factor in higher-order catastrophe models? An exploratory analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26,  259-368.